Artículos
¿Es el estilo de supervisión relevante para la efectividad de la pena de trabajo en beneficio de la comunidad?
Publicado
14-05-2024
Resumen
La pena de trabajo en beneficio de la comunidad es la sanción penal comunitaria más usada en España y resulta relevante conocer si el estilo de supervisión y, en particular el seguimiento de los Principios de Supervisión Efectiva (Core Correctional Practice), es útil para el logro de las finalidades de esta pena (cumplimiento de sus obligaciones, no reincidencia, desistimiento y reinserción). Con este objetivo en el trabajo se administra una encuesta a una muestra de 149 usuarios que cumplían la pena de trabajo en beneficio de la comunidad en el área metropolitana de Barcelona. A través de un análisis de regresión lineal se testan las hipótesis de la investigación y se obtiene un resultado parcialmente favorable a ellas, mostrando que dos dimensiones de estos principios (el Uso efectivo de la autoridad y el Modelaje y refuerzo) están asociados al logro de las finalidades de esta pena.
Citas
Andersen, L., & Wildeman, C. (2015). Measuring the effect of probation and parole officers on labor market outcomes and recidivism. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31, 629–652. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-014-9243-4
Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (1990). Classification for effective rehabilitation. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 17,19-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854890017001004
Bijleveld, C., van der Geest, V., & Hendriks, J. (2012). Vulnerable youths in pathways to adulthood. En R. Oeber, M, Hoeve, W. Solt & P. van del Laan (Eds.) Persisters and Desisters from Adolescence to Adulthood (pp.105-126). Ashgate.
Blay, E. (2019). El papel de los delegados de ejecución en la ejecución penal en la comunidad ¿gestores o agentes de rehabilitación?. Indret, 4, 1-32.
Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Scott, T., Bourgon, G., & Yessine, A. (2008). Exploring the black box of community supervision. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 47(3), 248-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509670802134085
Bouffard, J. A., & Muftić, L. R. (2007). The effectiveness of community service sentences compared to traditional fines for low-level offenders. The Prison Journal, 87(2), 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885507303741
Buckner, Z., Martin, S., Norris, K., & Walker, D. (2023). Does procedural justice matter in probation? Investigating the relationship between procedural just treatment and law-abiding behavior among a sample of high-risk offenders. Crime & Delinquency. https://doi.org/10.1177/00111287231211265
Chadwick, N., Dewolf, A., & Serin, R. (2015). Effectively training community supervision officers: a meta-analytic review of the impact on offender outcome. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(10), 977–989. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854815595661
Cid, J. (2009). La Elección del Castigo. Suspensión o Probation versus Prisión. Bosch.
Cid, J. (2020). El Futuro de la prisión en España. Revista Española de Investigación Criminológica,18(1),1-32. https://Doi.Org/10.46381/Reic.V18i0.285
Cid, J. & Marti, J. (2012). Turning points and returning points. understanding the role of family ties in the process of desistance. European Journal of Criminology, 9(6), 603-620. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370812453102
Cid, J. & Martí, J. (2017). Imprisonment, social support, and desistance: a theoretical approach to pathways of desistance and persistence for imprisoned men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(13), 1433-1454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X15623988
Cullen, F. (1994). Social support as an organizing concept for criminology. Justice Quarterly, 11(4), 527-559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418829400092421
Cullen, F., Jonson, C., & Mears, D. (2017). Reinventing community corrections. Crime and Justice, 46, 27-69. Dowden, C. & Andrews, D. (2004). The importance of staff practice in delivering effective correctional treatment: a meta-analytic review of core correctional practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 48(2), 203-214. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X03257765
Dünkel, F. (2017). European penology: the rise and fall of prison population rates in Europe in times of migrant crises and terrorism. European Journal of Criminology, 14(6), 629-653. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708177339
Duwe, G., & Clark, V. (2013). Blessed be the social tie that binds: the effects of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 24(3), 271-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403411429724
Duwe, G., & Johnson, B. R. (2016). The effects of prison visits from community volunteers on offender recidivism. The Prison Journal, 96(2), 279-303. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885515618468
Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. The American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
Kennealy, P., Skeem, J., Manchak. S. & Louden, J. (2012). Firm, fair and caring officer-offender relationship protect against supervision failure. Law and Human Behaviour, 36(6), 496-505. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093935
Klement, C. (2015). Comparing the effects of community service and imprisonment on reconviction: results from a quasi-experimental Danish study. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 11, 237–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-015-9231-1
Laub, J., & Sampson, R. (2003). Shared Beginnings, Different Lives. Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Harvard University Press.
Martí, J., Albani, E., Ibàñez, A. & Cid, J. (2021). Personal networks and desistance from crime in young offenders. European Journal of Criminology, 18(2), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370819842207
Martí, J. & Cid, J. (2015). Encarcelamiento, lazos familiares y reincidencia. explorando los límites del familismo. Revista Internacional de Sociología, 73(1), E002. https://Doi.Org/10.3989/Ris.2013.02.04
Martinson, R. (1974). What works?-questions and answers about prison reforms. Public Interest, 35, 23-5
Maruna, S. (2001). Making Good. How ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild their Lives. American Psychological Association.
McIvor, G. (1992). Sentenced to Serve. The Operation and Impact of Community Service by Offenders. Averbury.
McNeill, F. (2019). Resettlement, reintegration, and desistance in Europe. En F. Dünkel, I. Pruin, A. Storgaard & J. Weber (Eds.), Prisoner Resettlement in Europe (pp. 365-383). Routledge.
Morash, M., Kashy, D. A., Smith, S. W., & Cobbina, J. E. (2015). The effects of probation or parole supervision interactions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 42(4), 412-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854814551602
Nagin, D., Cullen, F., & Jonson, C. (2009). Imprisonment and reoffending. Crime and Justice, 38(1), 115-200. https://doi.org/10.1086/599202
Pérez, M. (coord), Grané, A., Romera, R., Gil, P., Monteros, S., & Montanés, V. (2021). Trabajos en Beneficio de la Comunidad y el impacto de la COVID-19 en su desarrollo. Cruz Roja Española.
Raynor, P., Ugwudike, P. & Vanstone, M. (2014). The impact of skills in probation work: a reconviction study. Criminology and Criminal Justice, 14(2), 235-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813494869
Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (1993). Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Harvard University Press.
Sampson, R. & Laub, J. (1997). A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. En T. Thornberry (Ed.), Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency (pp. 113-161). Transaction Publishers.
Schroeder, R., Giordano, P., & Cernkovich, S. (2007). Drug use and desistance processes. Criminology, 45(1), 191-222. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2007.00076.x
Skeem, J., Louden, J., Polaschek, D. & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19, 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.19.4.397
Sturm, A., de Vogel, V., Menger, A., & Huibers, M. (2022). The price of mistrust: a study into the working alliance as predictor for recidivism. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37, 576–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-021-09450-1
Tonry, M. (2014). Why crime rates are falling throughout the western world. Crime and Justice, 43(1), 1-63. https://doi.org/10.1086/678181
Trotter, C. (1996). The impact of different supervision practices in community corrections: cause for optimism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 29(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/000486589602900103
Trotter, C. (2013). Reducing recidivism through probation supervision: what we know and don’t know from four decades of research. Federal Probation, 77(2), 43-48.
Vasilescu, C. (2019). Análisis de la Ejecución de las Medidas Penales Alternativas desde una Perspectiva de Género. Universitat de Girona [Tesis Doctoral]. https://www.tdx.cat/handle/10803/672285?show=full
Viglione, J., & Labrecque, R. M. (2021). Core correctional practices in community supervision: an evaluation of a policy mandate to increase probation officer use of skills. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 65(8), 858-881. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X20981045
Villettaz, P., Gilliéron, G., & Killias, M. (2014). The Effects on Re-Offending of Custodial Versus Non-Custodial Sanctions. Swedish Council for Crime Prevention
Wermink, H. T., Blokland, A. A. J., Nieuwbeerta, P., Nagin, D., & Tollenaar, N. (2010). Comparing the effects of community service and short-term imprisonment on recidivism: a matched samples approach. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 6(3), 325-349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-010-9097-1
Categorías
Cómo citar
Agencias de apoyo
- Centro de Estudios Jurídicos y Formación Especializada (Generalitat de Cataluña)
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 José Cid Moliné, Anna Meléndez, Costanza Busquets, Carmen Navarro, Judit Xufré, Iman el Kabiri, Tania Ramírez, Albert Pedrosa, Joel Martí
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.