Artículos
Cómo perciben los menores infractores la justicia que se les aplica: un acercamiento desde la justicia procedimental
Publicado
13-09-2018
Resumen
Esta investigación pretende conocer en qué medida los menores sancionados perciben el proceso penal como justo, atendiendo a su relación con los distintos operadores jurídicos con los que han tenido contacto. Para ello se ha elaborado un cuestionario adhoc el cual, tras haber sido sometido a un proceso de validación por expertos, se ha pasado a una muestra de infractores que están cumpliendo una medida sancionadora en la provincia de Málaga. Los resultados dejan ver que los elementos que hacen percibir el proceso penal juvenil como justo pueden no estar suficientemente presentes entre estos jóvenes. Asimismo, las diferencias en la valoración de los distintos profesionales que contactan con ellos parecen ser notables.
Palabras clave:
Justicia juvenil, Justicia procedimental, Percepción de menores infractoresCitas
Akinlabi, O. (2015). Young people, procedural justice and police legitimacy in Nigeria. Policing and Society, 27, 419-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2015.1077836
Agustyn, M. B. (2016). Updating perception of (in)justice. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 53, 255-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427815616991
Baz, O. & Fernández-Molina, E. (2017). Process-based model in adolescent. Analyzing police legitimacy and juvenile delinquency within a legal socialization framework. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-017-9357-y
Bernuz Beneitez, M. J. (2014). La legitimidad de la justicia de menores: entre justicia procedimental y justicia social. InDret 1/14.
Birckhead, T. (2009). Toward a theory of procedural justice for juveniles. Buffalo Law Review, 57, 1447-1513.
Blader, S. & Tyler, T. (2003). A four-component model of procedural justice: Defining the meaning of a ”fair” process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 747-758. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006007
Boonie, R., Johnson, R., Chemers, R., & Schuck, J. (2013). Reforming Juvenile Justice. A Developmental Approach. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Bornstein, A., Marcus, A., Curtis, R., Rivera, S., & Swaner, R. (2016). Tell it to de Judge: procedural justice and a community court in Brooklyn. Political and legal Anthropology Review, 39, 206-225. https://doi.org/10.1111/plar.12190
Bouffard, L. A. & Piquero, N. L. (2010). Defiance theory and life course explanations of persistent offending. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707311642
Bradford, B. (2014). Policing and social identity: procedural justice, inclusion and cooperation between police and public. Policing and Society, 24, 22-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2012.724068
Braga, A. A. & Weisburd, D. L. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of research in crime and delinquency, 49, 323-358. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427811419368
Chui, W. H. & Cheng, K. (2015). Young people’s perception of lawyers in Hong Kong: A comparison between offenders, youth-at-risk and students. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43, 481-495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2014.12.001
Chui, W.H. & Cheng, K. (2017). Perceptions of Fairness and Satisfaction in Lawyer– Client Interactions Among Young Offenders in Hong Kong. Journal of mixed methods research, 11, 266-285. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815593834
Cohn, E., Trinkner, R., Rebellon, C., Van Gundy, K. & Cole, L. (2012). Legal Attitudes and Legitimacy: Extending the Integrated Legal Socialization Model. Victims and offenders, 7, 385-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/15564886.2012.713902
Dai, M., Frank, S. & Sun, I. (2011). Procedural justice during police-citizen encounters: The effects of process-based policing on citizen compliance and demeanor. Journal of Criminal Justice, 39, 159-168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2011.01.004
Fagan, J. & Piquero, A. (2007). Rational Choice and Developmental Influences on Recidivism Among Adolescent Felony Offenders. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 4, 715-748. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00105.x
Fagan, J. & Tyler, T. (2005). Legal socialization of Children and Adolescents. Social Justice Research, 18, 217-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-005-6823-3
Fernández-Molina, E. (2013). Una aproximación a la figura del abogado en la justicia de menores. Cuadernos de Política criminal, 109, 217-242.
Gau, J. M. & Brunson, R. K. (2010). Procedural Justice an Order Maintenance Policing: A Study of Inner-City Young Men’s Perceptions of Legitimacy. Justice Quarterly, 27, 163-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820902763889
Greene, C., Sprott, J. B., Madon, N. S., & Jung, M. (2010). Punishing processes in youth court: Procedural justice, Court Atmosphere ans Youths’ views of the legitimacy of the justice system. Canadian journal of Criminology and Criminal justice, 52, 527-544. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjccj.52.5.527
Hinds, L. (2007). Building Police-Youth Relationships: The Importance of Procedural Justice. Youth Justice, 7,195-209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473225407082510
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Stanko, B., & Hohl, K. (2012). Just authority? Trust in the police in England and Wales. Routledge, Londres.
Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. (2012). Why do people comply with the law. Legitimacy and the influence of legal institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52, 1051-1071. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azs032
Jonathan-Zamir, T., Mastrofski, S. D., & Moyal, S. (2015). Measuring procedural justice in police-citizen encounters. Justice Quarterly, 32, 845-871. https://doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2013.845677
Kirk, D.S. & Matsuda, M. (2011). Legal cynicism, collective efficacy and ecology of arrest. Criminology: an interdisciplinary Journal, 49, 443-472. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2011.00226.x
McCluskey, J. D. (2003). Police request for compliance: Coercive and procedurally just tactics. New York: LFB Scholary Publishing.
McGarrell, E., Corsaro, N., Hipple, N., & Bynum, T. (2010). Project safe neighborhoods and violent crime trends in US cities: Assessing violent crime impact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26, 165-190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-010-9091-9
Mulvey, E., Steinberg, L., Fagan, J., Cauffman, E., Piquero, A., Chassin, L.; Knight, G., Brame, R., Shubert, C., Hecker, T. & Losoya, S. (2004). Theory and Research on Desistance from Antisocial Activity among Serious Adolescent Offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 2, 213-236. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204004265864
Murphy, K. & Gaylor, A. (2010). Policing Youth: Can procedural justice nurture youth cooperation with pólice? Alfred Deakin Research Institute, Working paper no 6. Deakin University, Geelong, Australia.
Otto, K. & Dalbert, C. (2005). Belief in a just world and its functions for young prisioners. Journal or Research in Personality, 39, 559-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2005.01.004
Penner, E. K., Viljoen, J. L., Douglas, K. S., & Roesh, R. (2014). Procedural justice versus risk factors for offending: Predicting recidivism in youth. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 225-237. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000055
Piquero, A., Fagan, J., Mulvey, E., Steinberg, L., & Odgers, C. (2005). Developmental trajectories of legal socialization among serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 96, 267-298.
Reisig, M. Tankebe, J., & Mesko, G. (2014). Compliance with the law in Slovenia: The role of procedural justice and police legitimacy. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 20, 259-276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-013-9211-9
Saarikkomäki, E. (2016). Perceptions of procedural justice among young people: narratives of fair treatment in young people’s stories of police and security guard intervention. British Journal of Criminology, 56, 1253-1271. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azv102
Schulhofer, S. J., Tyler, T. R., & Huq, A. (2011). American policing at a crossroads: Unsustainable policies and the procedural justice alternative. The Journal of Criminal Law & Criminology, 101, 335–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0025-7753(11)70020-3
Sprott, J. & Greene, C. (2010). Trust and confidence in the courts: Does the quality of treatment young offenders receive affect their views of the courts?. Crime and Delinquency, 56, 269-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128707308176
Steiner, B. & Wooldredge, J. (2015). Examining the sources of correctional officer legitimacy. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 105, 679-704.
Sunshine, J. & Tyler, T. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37, 513-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5893.3703002
Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51, 103-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2012.00291.x
Tatar, J., Kaasa, S., & Cauffman, E. (2012). Perceptions of procedural justice among female offenders: Time does not heal all wounds. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 18, 268-296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854813497479
Tyler, T. (1990). Why people obey the law. Yale, University Press, New Haven.
Tyler, T. (2001). Public trust and confidence in legal authorities: What do majority and minority group members want from the law and legal institutions? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 215-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.438
Tyler, T. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy and the effective rule of the law. En M. Tonry (ed.) Crime and justice: A review of the research, 30, 283-357. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tyler, T. (2009). Legitimacy and criminal justice: The benefits of self-regulation. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 7, 307-359.
Tyler, T. (2015). Why trust matters with juveniles. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 85, 83-99. https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000104
Tyler, T. (2017). Can the police enhance their popular legitimacy through their conduct? Using Empirical Research to Inform Law. University Illinois Law Review, 19, 1971-1208.
Tyler, T., Casper, J. D., & Fisher, B. (1989). Maintaining Allegiance toward Political Authorities: The Role of Prior Attitudes and the Use of Fair Procedure. American Journal of Political Science, 33, 629-652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111066
Tyler, T. & Fagan, J. (2008). Legitimacy and cooperation: Why do people help the police fight crime in their communities? Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6, 231-75
Tyler, T., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Streets stops and police legitimacy: teachable moments in young urban men’s socialization. Journal of empirical legal studies, 11, 751-785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12055
Tyler, T., Goff, P., & MacCoun, R. (2015). The Impact of Psychological Science on Policing in the United States: Procedural Justice, Legitimacy, and Effective Law Enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 75-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615617791
Tyler, T. & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust the law: Encouraging public cooperation with the police and courts. New York. Russell Sage Foundation.
Tyler, T., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Streets stop and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11, 751–785. https://doi.org/10.1111/jels.12055
Tyler, T. & Jackson, J. (2014). Popular Legitimacy and the Exercise of Legal Authority: Motivating Compliance, Cooperation and Engagement. Psychology, Public Policy and Law, 20, 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034514
Vázquez Morales, D. & Fernández Molina, E. (2013). Confianza en los tribunales penales. Una vía normativa a la cooperación ciudadana con la justicia más allá de la amenaza y la coerción. Revista Electrónica de Ciencia Penal y Criminología, 15, 1-29.
Vidal, S., Cleary, H., Woolard, J., & Michel, J. (2017). Adolescents’ Legal Socialization: Effects of Interrogation and Miranda Knowledge on Legitimacy, Cynicism, and Procedural Justice en Youth Violence and Juvenile justice, 15, 419-440. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204016651479
Walters, G. D. (2018). Procedural justice, legitimacy beliefs and moral disengagement in emerging adulthood: Explaining continuity and resistance in the moral model of criminal lifestyle development. Law and Moral Behavior, 42, 37-49. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000266
Categorías
Cómo citar
Agencias de apoyo
- Universidad de Málaga
- Conserjería de Justicia e Interior de la Junta de Andalucía
Descargas
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2018 Fátima Pérez Jiménez, José Becerra Muñoz, Araceli Aguilar Conde
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.